and have occurred. Accepting that, I think the bike path is a revolution in urban mobility. Do not understand why some would trivialize. I mean that paleoconservatives lobby sees an attack on any changes that collides with its classic view of the city. With only 298 bikes there are already 6,495 subscribers. 21,000 people use the service daily. Who faces all this shows, in political terms, not personal, of course, stupidity. Some sectors, like the pedestrian, have done everything possible to not do. In Seville was first criticized and then many will point score. But we are pioneers in Europe. The bike is used and entire families.
| |
| Is not it great to have a solid intellectual and a Marxist analysis method? What is "a revolution in urban mobility" is not the bike that people use: the bike path that has put him. Other than that, he asked about the bicycle lane, and apart from the emptiness of rigor, all I can say to defend it is data ... Bikes on public service!. "You ask what you want, I'll answer whatever I want." |
Our man, of course, has nothing to defenses the bicycle lane, except for their fantasies and demag-shit. I imagine, he said, the number of users Sevici is ... thanks
0 comments:
Post a Comment